The practical operation of the new framework for agriculture will be substantially determined by how the regulations, Rules, guidance materials, Rulings, Protection Statements, Registers, data arrangements, and compliance practices are designed and subsequently implemented. NFF has always championed reforms that provide clear, efficient, and more predictable decision-making while maintaining appropriate environmental protections. We remain concerned that the proposed Tranche 2 package has been substantially brought forward at speed. This is occurring before the full regulatory framework (i.e., National Environmental Standards) has been designed, road-tested, publicly consulted on as a consolidated item, or assessed for its cumulative impact on agriculture. This is despite previous indications and statements that later-2026 would be the relevant implementation horizon. Our comments, concerns, and recommendations as it relates to the proposed Tranche 2 package are addressed below.
You may also like
National Biosecurity Reforms
The NFF strongly supports the National Biosecurity Strategy (NBS) as a framework to align priorities and actions to strengthen Australia’s biosecurity system. The proposed reform agenda presents a range of initiatives...
Declaring second generation anticoagulant rodenticides as restricted chemical products
The NFF does not support the APVMA proposal to declare second generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) as Restricted Chemical Products (RCPs) unless continuing access to SGARs for primary producers is guaranteed...
Farmers are not the Greens’ bargaining chip
Opinion editorial by Hamish McIntyre, NFF President On 1 July, the new National Environmental Protection Agency and Environment Information Australia formally commence. This is on top of laws already in force since 1...


