The NFF has consulted its member organisations on the proposed policy options and supports the view of Sheep Producers Australia (SPA) and the Australian Livestock Exporters’ Council (ALEC) that the four policy options outlined in the discussion paper are reasonable starting points, but that each would require review as new information – such as animal welfare indicators – and technology become available. Accordingly, we support the development of an Option 5, in line with the rationale outlined in the SPA and ALEC submissions to this process.
You may also like
Renewing the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority engagement mode
The NFF acknowledges the APVMA’s work in pursuit of more accessible, proactive, and inclusive stakeholder engagement and supports the renewal of the APVMA’s stakeholder engagement model. However, the NFF holds serious...
Chrissy KerinNational Small Business Strategy backs agricultural right to repair
The National Farmers’ Federation has applauded the National Small Business Strategy backing right to repair “especially in agriculture and farming” as part of much needed competition policy reforms. NFF President David...
Stacey DavidsonAustralian Carbon Credit Unit Scheme Sunsetting Methodologies
The National Farmers’ Federation (NFF) appreciates the opportunity provided by the Department to provide feedback regarding the nineteen sunsetting methodologies under the Australian Carbon Credit Unit (ACCU) Scheme...
Ashleigh Whittaker
Add comment