The NFF’s 3 April 2014 submission to the Senate Standing Committees on Environment and Communications Inquiry into Offsets outlined two major concerns; offsets are generally not feasible for agriculture applications under the EPBC Act, and secondly, that agricultural land is often the ‘target’ of large enterprises, such as coal mines, seeking to offset the impacts of their own developments. The NFF advocates for a more flexible approach based on the nature of the project, the availability of direct and indirect offsets, and whether the offset delivers improved environmental outcomes for the projected matter.
You may also like
APVMA draft Strategic Plan 2025–30
The NFF is a stringent supporter of the role of the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) as Australia’s robust, independent, and science- and risk-based chemical regulator, and supports the...
Chrissy KerinStrategic Examination of Research and Development
The NFF’s submission to the Department of Industry, Science and Resources’ (DISR’s) Strategic Examination of Research and Development highlighted the importance of research and development to Australian agriculture...
Improved Avoided Clearing of Native Regrowth (IACNR) Carbon Farming Methodology
The methodology’s structure must remain focused on its core purpose, which is to deliver verifiable carbon abatement under the ACCU Scheme. It must not be a mechanism for broader revegetation or conservation goals. The...
Add comment