The NFF’s 3 April 2014 submission to the Senate Standing Committees on Environment and Communications Inquiry into Offsets outlined two major concerns; offsets are generally not feasible for agriculture applications under the EPBC Act, and secondly, that agricultural land is often the ‘target’ of large enterprises, such as coal mines, seeking to offset the impacts of their own developments. The NFF advocates for a more flexible approach based on the nature of the project, the availability of direct and indirect offsets, and whether the offset delivers improved environmental outcomes for the projected matter.
You may also like
Renewing the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority engagement mode
The NFF acknowledges the APVMA’s work in pursuit of more accessible, proactive, and inclusive stakeholder engagement and supports the renewal of the APVMA’s stakeholder engagement model. However, the NFF holds serious...
National Small Business Strategy backs agricultural right to repair
The National Farmers’ Federation has applauded the National Small Business Strategy backing right to repair “especially in agriculture and farming” as part of much needed competition policy reforms. NFF President David...
Australian Carbon Credit Unit Scheme Sunsetting Methodologies
The National Farmers’ Federation (NFF) appreciates the opportunity provided by the Department to provide feedback regarding the nineteen sunsetting methodologies under the Australian Carbon Credit Unit (ACCU) Scheme...
Add comment