The NFF’s 5 March 2015 submission outlines that while farmers are not the direct recipients of the regulations imposed by the Water Act 2007 (the Act), they inevitably bear the ultimate cost of those regulations. Referring to its previous submission to the recent review of the Act, NFF notes that a comprehensive evaluation of the costs and benefits is required, not just an exercise in identifying and removing duplication. NFF underlines their support for the views of IIOs, and for their request through their peak organisation National Irrigators’ Council to have a more formal role in the inter-agency process. NFF suggests that detailed engagement with the IIOs would provide the best avenue for the interagency working group to best understand the concerns of the irrigation sector.
You may also like
AgriEmpower Scholarship application form
AgriEmpower Scholarships 2026 Please follow directions on the form to apply. Please note; it is difficult to save your application and come back to it, we suggest compiling your answers in a separate document and copy...
Rebecca WildeRequest for Information for Australian Bushland Program Strategic Property Purchases
NFF understands that there is an approximate shortfall of 5.31% under the 30% target for land. Progress must not come at the expense of agricultural land. This principle is already reflected in Commonwealth policy...
Chrissy KerinNational Statement on First Nations in Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
The NFF is a genuine and willing partner in supporting the advancement of Indigenous peoples in agriculture, fisheries and forestry. The NFF believes a National Statement, properly consulted and framed, can play a part...
Add comment