The NFF’s 5 March 2015 submission outlines that while farmers are not the direct recipients of the regulations imposed by the Water Act 2007 (the Act), they inevitably bear the ultimate cost of those regulations. Referring to its previous submission to the recent review of the Act, NFF notes that a comprehensive evaluation of the costs and benefits is required, not just an exercise in identifying and removing duplication. NFF underlines their support for the views of IIOs, and for their request through their peak organisation National Irrigators’ Council to have a more formal role in the inter-agency process. NFF suggests that detailed engagement with the IIOs would provide the best avenue for the interagency working group to best understand the concerns of the irrigation sector.
You may also like
Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) Proposal P1055 – Definitions for gene technology and new breeding techniques
The NFF recognises the potential of genetic modification (GM) and particularly new breeding techniques (NBTs) as a valuable tool within agricultural production systems. The NFF welcomes the FSANZ proposal to modernise...
Tax Laws Amendment (Incentivising Food Donations to Charitable Organisations) Bill 2024
The NFF’s 2030 Roadmap released in 2018 outlined a vision to halve food waste by 2030. In pursuing this metric, the NFF has worked closely with Foodbank as well as identifying key policy levers that can take the...
NFF submission to National Biosecurity Strategy Action Plan consultation
Australia’s biosecurity system is fundamental to the success of our agriculture industries, to the health of our natural environment and to our society and economy at large. The NFF welcomed the release of the National...
Add comment