The National Farmers’ Federation supports a request today by the Federal Agriculture & Water Resources Minister, David Littleproud for the Auditor General to investigate all Murray Darling Basin water buybacks carried out under successive governments since 2008.
NFF Chief Executive Tony Mahar said in fact, the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) had already planned to investigate the issue.
“Minister Littleproud’s request will rightly serve to refine the scope of the investigation and to expedite the process, which is welcomed.”
Mr Mahar said the ANAO was the appropriate body to undertake the work given it was a statutory, independent body required to be systematic and transparent in its findings.
“We will always support steps to increase transparency and good governance, and if and when that governance is doubted, we support a review by an appropriate authority.”
Mr Mahar said the Productivity Commission’s five-year assessment of the implementation of the Murray Darling Basin Plan had also flagged the need for an audit.
“Yet again recommendations from the Productivity Commission’s Report into the Implementation of the Murray Darling Basin Plan have proven to be informative, for example Recommendation 3.2 outlined below.”
“The Department of Agriculture and Water Resources should ensure that water recovery aligns with environmental requirements and its processes for doing so are transparent.
“To support accountability, it should commit to publishing all advice provided by the Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder and the Murray Darling Basin Authority (including advice on strategic purchases) once transactions are complete in a Sustainable Diversion Limit resource unit.”
(See pages 36 and 103 of the Report here https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/basin-plan/report/basin-plan.pdf )
Mr Mahar said it was imperative that close attention was paid to the Productivity Commission’s detailed report and that its recommendations informed future inquiries of, and adjustments to, the Plan’s delivery platforms.
“The Plan was always intended to be dynamic. The review mechanisms are embedded in the enabling legislation, including the Productivity Commission’s five yearly report requirement.
“Farmers continue to look for the fair and just implementation of the Plan which ensures economic, socio economic (including regional community resilience) and environmental impacts are paramount.
“This is much more important than shrill debate during an election campaign. A medium and long term view is needed,” Mr Mahar said.
You may also like
Biosecurity Protection Levy Senate Committee public hearing
Today the Senate Rural, Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee holds the public hearing on the Biosecurity Protection Levy. Below is National Farmers’ Federation CEO, Tony...
NFF calls on Australian governments to declare war on Red Imported Fire Ants
The National Farmers’ Federation is calling on the Federal, state and territory governments to urgently ramp up the war on an invasive species that could slash agricultural output by upwards of 40%. The Senate Inquiry...
Applications extended for female leadership program
Women wanting to increase their leadership skills and contribute to narrowing the gender gap in agriculture still have time to apply for the National Farmers’ Federation flagship Diversity in Agriculture Leadership...
Add comment