The NFF’s 3 April 2014 submission to the Senate Standing Committees on Environment and Communications Inquiry into Offsets outlined two major concerns; offsets are generally not feasible for agriculture applications under the EPBC Act, and secondly, that agricultural land is often the ‘target’ of large enterprises, such as coal mines, seeking to offset the impacts of their own developments. The NFF advocates for a more flexible approach based on the nature of the project, the availability of direct and indirect offsets, and whether the offset delivers improved environmental outcomes for the projected matter.
You may also like
AgriEmpower Scholarship application form
AgriEmpower Scholarships 2026 Please follow directions on the form to apply. Please note; it is difficult to save your application and come back to it, we suggest compiling your answers in a separate document and copy...
Rebecca WildeRequest for Information for Australian Bushland Program Strategic Property Purchases
NFF understands that there is an approximate shortfall of 5.31% under the 30% target for land. Progress must not come at the expense of agricultural land. This principle is already reflected in Commonwealth policy...
Chrissy KerinNational Statement on First Nations in Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
The NFF is a genuine and willing partner in supporting the advancement of Indigenous peoples in agriculture, fisheries and forestry. The NFF believes a National Statement, properly consulted and framed, can play a part...
Add comment